AKG C 411 PP 4-stars Reviews

Satisfied with quality and functionality

In general I am satisfied with its functionality, only in very lower frequencies it's a little weak. I am curious if really has 10hz and above a possibility to detect the signal.

For the experimental recordist, not good for live music

This microphone is good if you want to do an experimental recording of some resonating material without the ambient noise in your way, so it can be a very valuable tool if you're a sound designer. In my opinion it's not very good for recording violins, guitars etc in a studio, because the self noise is very high and the frequency response is not very linear. As a live reinforcement microphone it can feedback if pumped too high, so beware, but sometimes it helped me as second microphone to amplify double basses and saved the concert. Anyway, it's WAY better than a piezo for most applications. Note: the best adhesive to pair with this microphone in my opinion is called Blu Tak, made by Bostik.

Great for acoustic instruments in a loud band

It works great for amplifying quiet instruments in a loud environment, the sound quality isn't excellent, but if the mic is placed in the right spot, it should sound acceptable.

I would suggest to buy additional adhesive foil, because it will run short faster than you think.

Great for amplifying an acoustic guitar

I use the AKG C 411 PP to amplify my Loar 600 and it works perfectly. Captures the rich sound of the instrument. The only inconvenience is that you need to use some sticky material (provided with the microphone) to attach the microphone to the guitar. Not sure if this material damages the instrument in the long run. So far I cannot notice any damage.