Warwick 46200 M Red Label 3-stars Reviews

Rating :

1
2
3
4
5

stars

If you own this item for a while and already published a review somewhere on the internet, you can publish it again here with a custom past date :

2 years ago

Hmm... Pay more, get better.

Well, I bought these as they were cheap for a second bass I own. They're solid metal, no material at the ends, no aggregation at the ends, just metal. They're quite twangy upon installation, too much high end and almost buzz. I rarely break strings, nearly never. One of these broke after a couple of months. Don't let the Warwick brand fool you, they're cheap for a reason. Save up a wee bit more and get yourself a better pair I'd say.

7 years ago

not for too long middle range and quality bass strings. they get rusty sooner than the other strings

9 years ago

DOA

This review is probably an outlier, but I gave a set to my brother, and he said that the ball end had come off before he had even strung it on his L2500.

11 years ago

I doubt it....

One might have a longterm debate about how much a good set of bass strings should cost but it is undoubtable, that these Warwick Red Label strings are really cheap. So I thought that they should be worth a try. Having tried a lot of other string manufacturers and producers before I have to say, they are not. The sound is ok at first, some nice low end, warmth, little highs. Therefore they are scratchy, they do not feel soft at all, they take sliding noise from ones fingers very seriously. After one/two weeks, they sound old and mushy. It is ok to save money for strings, as I can only recommend Fender strings at the moment, but these are not enough.

Image Warwick 46200 M Red Label

Technical Data

  • Manufactured by Warwick
  • Released in 2010
  • Average price : $11
Share linkedin post Tweet Share